ForumGeneral Discussion ► Communication of Informed Like-Minded Individuals
In this thread, users will converse with one another, except with one ideal concept in mind. The user must challenge their own selves to communicate in a way that is as bombastic as conceptually possible. The goal is to be garrulous in your manner of mentioning the subject matter. There exist multiple ways to approach this challenge. You can use simple, uptight language that is pleasing to presenters and informational experts, which most of this explanation consists of. Another entertaining possibility is to try and construct a response that will force the reader to access the dictionary as many times as possible. This would be most exciting to see! We could even institute a competition! On one last note, please pay attention to your grammar. The other members of the thread can and probably will use their inflated lexicons to publically shame you for it, so be consistently cautious.

You should at least attempt to read the bullcrap above that I spent way too long typing, as I feel it explains better, but let me simplify:

Talk about anything, but be uselessly wordy and complex. Above is a good example.

This will probably die. It may already be made. No idea.
  
how to read?
  
Hello,

Probot said:
simple uptight language


should be

Probot said:
simple, uptight language
  
It seems my slight mention of proper grammar has already been used against my case. How hypocritical of me.
  
One need not apologize for their grammatical failings, but rather move forward with all the fervor of the queen's cavalry unto the new dawn.
  
What is grammar, if it exists?
  
Grammar is the act of making written language apear more complicated and obscured but more clearly understood when one is able to understand it.
  
So we need to see
  
Complex yet grammatically correct sentence structures, you say? Well, then, I'd like to offer up the following classic: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
  
Probot said:
You can use simple, uptight language that is pleasing to presenters and informational experts, which most of this explanation consists of.

"Of which".
  
eriophora said:
Complex yet grammatically correct sentence structures, you say? Well, then, I'd like to offer up the following classic: Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.
eriphoria, you are delightful human who has made me chortle most effortlessly. You continue to solidify your position as one of my favorite participants on this glorious online forum of discussion.
  
Allow me to express my most sincere gratitude for your kind words <3 I'm overcome that you should think so highly of me!
  
While the prolixity of your writing is quite turgid, your request to extenuate the pleonasm of your compatriots seems a tad distasteful. Indeed, your comment to start this thread is very circumlocutory. Of course, the majority of the members on this site are loquacious or palaverous, but there is still no need to encourage the prolixity of the comments. Your initial points are way too periphrastic, and the garrulousness of it, frankly, irks me. My post is by no means glib, and my magniloquent and fustian prose may be upsetting to some, but I stand by my effusive statement, if for no reason other than the fact that no one can understand what I am saying. Let the contest begin.
  
Yo wuts thes, words stuf 4?
  
While the prolixity of your writing is quite turgid, your request to extenuate the pleonasm of your compatriots seems a tad distasteful. Indeed, your comment to start this thread is very circumlocutory. Of course, the majority of the members on this site are loquacious or palaverous, but there is still no need to encourage the prolixity of the comments. Your initial points are way too periphrastic, and the garrulousness of it, frankly, irks me. My post is by no means glib, and my magniloquent and fustian prose may be upsetting to some, but I stand by my effusive statement, if for no reason other than the fact that no one can understand what I am saying. Let the contest begin.


Yeah watch out we just got englished on. I'm pretty sure I know what about half of those words mean. Sorry for not sounding smart when saying this XD
  
While the prolixity of your writing is quite turgid, your request to extenuate the pleonasm of your compatriots seems a tad distasteful. Indeed, your comment to start this thread is very circumlocutory. Of course, the majority of the members on this site are loquacious or palaverous, but there is still no need to encourage the prolixity of the comments. Your initial points are way too periphrastic, and the garrulousness of it, frankly, irks me. My post is by no means glib, and my magniloquent and fustian prose may be upsetting to some, but I stand by my effusive statement, if for no reason other than the fact that no one can understand what I am saying. Let the contest begin.


If the competitive aspect of this thread is to be instituted, it seems there is already a clear victor in mind for the position of first. The user likely took a rather large time to construct this response, most positively enlisting the help of a thesaurus. How admirable.
  
What does "pog" means?
  
MONO said:
What does "pog" mean?


Play of the Game
  
That becomes into "potg"
  
MONO said:
That becomes into "potg"


Pardon my "grammar nazi" tendencies good sir, but in this sentence, the word "into" serves no purpose and the sentence would be better written as the following:

MONO said:
That becomes "potg"


You also forgot to add a period at the end of your statement. How shameful.
  
Forum > General Discussion > Communication of Informed Like-Minded Individuals